DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
TAL
Docket No: 31
0)
2-14/
g-
nm
Ww
Ww
A
=
=
ihe
141
10 October 2014
This is in reference to your reconsideration request dated
10 April 2014 with enclosures. You previously petitioned the
Board and were advised in our letter of 20 November 1990, that
your application had been denied.
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of your application, any material
submitted in support of your application, and prior case file.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined the psychological evaluation notes
you submitted, even though not previously considered by the
Board, were insufficient to establish the existence of material
error or injustice. The Board determined the psychological
evaluation notes you provided were not enough to outweigh the
significant misconduct you committed while on active duty.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regrettable that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s
decision. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by
the Board prior to making its decision in your case. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7884 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on § January 2015. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board dated 18 June 2014, the e-mail from HOMC dated 7 July 2014, and the advisory opinions from HOMC dated 2 September and 6 October 2014, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02408-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9166 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of: Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decigion in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden ison the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5361 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case Eile. After careful and conscientious consideration of the enti record, the Board determined the letter from the Depart Veterans Affairs stating you are being treated for s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5583 14
B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8485 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, the Board's file on your prior case, and applicable statutes, regulations and dered the advisory opinions d 9 and 1’ policies. The y 2014 with attachments December 2013 and 10 January 2914, copies of Ww Board also considered your 1etters dated 8 Jul and 8 August 2014. and conscientious consideration of the entire record, ubmitted was ansufficient to a that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR998 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1910 MMSR- 3 dated 16 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. In this Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7193 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in - support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 of Gy ww a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8072 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 14 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the medical evidence that you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR11423 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2480 JRE Docket No. Documentery material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...